The Digital Tell: Using Behavioral Indicators to Understand Juror Mindsets

In Part I of The Future of Legal Strategy series, we explored how intelligence frameworks can shift jury research from a demographic guessing game to a disciplined behavioral analysis. One of the most effective ways to achieve this shift is by identifying behavioral indicators — subtle but revealing online actions or patterns that offer insight into how a person thinks, reacts, or engages.

Here are a few of the key indicators we use in jury research to help our clients develop deeper strategic insight:

• Engagement Style 

Is the juror active online? Do they passively scroll, or do they like, comment, and share? A juror’s digital engagement patterns can signal underlying personality traits or behavioral tendencies. Passive behavior may suggest someone who is more reserved, conflict-averse, or prefers privacy for personal or professional reasons. On the other hand, high engagement may indicate a desire for influence, attention, or affirmation. Both profiles can play pivotal roles during deliberations and are important to assess in advance.

• Emotional Tone 

What emotional tone does the juror consistently express online? Do they lean toward humor, sarcasm, outrage, empathy, or negativity? Jurors who consistently convey strong emotional tones may be more reactive to testimony, more likely to pass quick judgments, and more emotionally engaged in the courtroom — positively or negatively.

• Consistency of Beliefs 

Do they maintain consistent viewpoints over time and across platforms? Or do they display conflicting or fluctuating beliefs? Inconsistencies may point to impulsivity or susceptibility to social media influence — traits that can affect how jurors process evidence or respond to persuasive arguments. This often aligns with emotional tone and should be evaluated in that context.

• Content Type Preference 

Do they primarily share videos and memes, or are they posting articles and engaging in long-form discussions? This indicator may seem secondary, but it can offer meaningful insight depending on the case. Preference for visual, fast-paced content (e.g., TikTok, Instagram Reels) may indicate a juror with a shorter attention span or a visual learning style. Those who share and engage with written content may be more reflective or analytical. These patterns can inform how jurors absorb complex testimony or respond to different types of exhibits in court.

These are just a few examples of how online behavioral indicators can help paint a fuller picture of a potential juror. While no single data point tells the whole story, a trained jury researcher can identify patterns and, when combined with hard data, use them to build a behavioral profile that supports legal strategy.

So the question becomes: Are you seeing the full behavioral picture — or just the surface?

---

👇 We want to hear from you. How are you incorporating behavioral analysis into your juror evaluations? Drop a comment or share this article with someone in your network who should be thinking beyond demographics.

🔍 For more insights like this, be sure to follow Social Slooth on LinkedIn and subscribe to our Slooth News newsletter. And if you missed the earlier parts of The Future of Legal Strategy series, now’s the time to catch up — they lay the groundwork for this evolving approach to juror intelligence.